Acta Sociologica

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kojo-Austin, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Acta Sociologica, Vol. 32, No. 3, 253-260 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/000169938903200304

Problems of Multidisciplinary Research in Health Care - the Case of Birth Services

Elina Hemminki

Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki

Hellevi Kojo-Austin

Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki

Much of the medical technology currently in use needs evaluation: it has been introduced without assessment, and indications have changed in practice. However, evaluation of established technology offers methodological and administrative problems which impede it. In addition, social scientists meet with practical difficulties when trying to cooperate closely with doctors These problems are illustrated by our experiences in a project evaluating the structure ot and interventions in Finnish birth care. Our project included assessment of iron prophylaxis, long-term effects of cesarean sections, effect of human support during birth, and use of hospital antenatal clinics. The latter project in particular raised opposition from clinical experts even though increased use of hospital services had caused financial and practical problems. Attempts to prevent our project from taking place came from ethical com mittees and through expert statements; this opposition changed the original study design. These experiences are the basis of a discussion of: the import ance of the object of the research, the definition of research expertise, the myth of personal experience, and the merits of insiders and outsiders as evaluators in medical settings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?