Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Acta Sociologica
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eliaeson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Influences on Max Weber's Methodology

Sven Eliaeson

Department of Public Administration, University of Karlstad

There may be many reasons for our turning to the classics of social science. We might for instance find it useful to apply their concepts to our present reality, or to utilize them in our recurring discussions in normative issues. In the case of Weber I rather suggest that we turn to him for identity, roots. In the famous Methodenstreit between Austrian marginalism (Menger) and the historicism of the younger historical school (Schmoller) the ever-green tension between theory and history is reproduced. This is still a main paradigmatic divide, as manifested today in both sociology and history. Weber is to be seen as a mediator more than genuine classic His way of developing neo-Kantian methodologies (Rickert's Wertbeziehung) and combining them with marginalist models in constructing his ideal-types allows for intersubjectivity and, thus, testability (rationale Evidenz) Lucid concept-formation in Weber's 'aspect-choice-methodology' is an adaptation of secular tools for the newly established sociology in a mode that could be accepted in the German intellectual setting, with its historicist hegemony.

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 33, No. 1, 15-30 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/000169939003300102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
M. Ekstrom
Causal Explanation of Social Action: The Contribution of Max Weber and of Critical Realism to a Generative View of Causal Explanation in Social Science
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1992; 35(2): 107 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]