Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Acta Sociologica
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dirk De Graaf, N.
Right arrow Articles by Heath, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Husbands' and Wives' Voting Behaviour in Britain: Class-dependent Mutual Influence of Spouses*

Nan Dirk De Graaf

University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Anthony Heath

Nuffield College, Oxford

We investigate the relative impact of respondent's and spouse's class on voting behaviour using logistic diagonal reference models. We test several hypotheses with data from the British Election Surveys of 1974, 1979, 1983 and 1987. We find that there are still differences between men and women in the extent to which their own class positions account for the way they vote, women being more influenced by their partner's class position than are men. We also find that, although men have in general a higher class position, a 'class dominance' model cannot account for the greater influence of husbands than of wives. Our results do however modify the conventional approach to class in important respects. We find significant interaction effects, women in the higher and lower service class and women in blue-collar occupations behaving much like men: that is, they take more account of their own class than of their partner's. Conversely, women in the petty bourgeoisie and in the routine nonmanual class take relatively little account of their own class positions; their behaviour is more in line with the conventional assumption of male dominance. Finally, no trends over time, whether towards 'indi vidualism', 'feminism' or 'sharing', could be detected.

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 35, No. 4, 311-322 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/000169939203500404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
M. Van Berkel and N. D. De Graaf
Husband's and Wife's Culture Participation and their Levels of Education: A Case of Male Dominance?
Acta Sociologica, July 1, 1995; 38(2): 131 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
G. Evans
Class, Prospects and the Life-cycle: Explaining the Association between Class Position and Political Preferences
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1993; 36(3): 263 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]