This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pedersen, A. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Inequality as Relative Deprivation

A Sociological Approach to Inequality Measurement

NOVA – Norwegian Social Research awp{at}nova.no

Although concerns for inequality are at the heart of the sociological tradition, few sociologists have taken a serious interest in the normative and methodological issues involved in the choice between different measures of inequality. It is argued in this article that the widely used but also widely criticized Gini index can be seen to incorporate a particularly sociological conception of inequality. The Gini index has features that are alien to mainstream welfare economics, but perfectly sensible if inequality is understood more sociologically as arising from a state of relative deprivation. However, the commitment to a relativistic conception of inequality leads to serious theoretical and practical complications. The implicit rationale of the Gini index assumes that it is applied to a ‘reference population’ – where everybody compares themselves with everybody else. It is not obvious that the residents of a nation-state always constitute a reference population in this sense, and arguments can be found both for widening and narrowing the scope of the relevant population. Both aggregation and disaggregation from whatever is considered to be the ‘appropriate’ scope of the reference population is problematic and requires different methodological solutions.

Key Words: inequality • measurement • social welfare • relative deprivation • reference group

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 47, No. 1, 31-49 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0001699304041550


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Yngwe, O. Lundberg, and B. Burstrom On the importance of internalized consumption norms for ill health Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 76 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]