Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Acta Sociologica
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lillbacka, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Social Capital

Assessing Construct Stability of Various Operationalizations of Social Capital in a Finnish Sample

Ralf Lillbacka

Swedish Polytechnic, Vasa, Finland

State of research: Despite immense popularity among contemporary social scientists, opinions are divided on how social capital should be defined and measured. In fact, few inquiries have attempted to demonstrate a stable empirical correlate, e.g. through tests for internal consistency and construct stability. Theory: Social capital is constituted and sustained through processes similar to an iterated k-player coordination game; a crucial aspect is whether individuals can utilize the social context as a medium for gaining utilities. Indicators describing how individuals perceive various aspects of the ‘game’ can be used to identify and study social capital on the individual level. Four potential indicators are considered: (1) interpersonal trust, (2) the respondent's social network, (3) self-efficacy, and (4) membership in voluntary associations. Method and data: Various factor models are tested for cross-context stability and unidimensionality in three subsamples with highly different demographic and socio-economic characteristics; construct stability is presumed to indicate a stable empirical correlate. Finnish survey data from 2001 (n=1439) are used. Results: Cross-context stability is demonstrated for a construct based on interpersonal trust, social network and self-efficacy, which corresponds to the concept introduced by James Coleman.

Key Words: construct stability • self-efficacy • social capital • social network • trust

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 49, No. 2, 201-220 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0001699306064774
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Acta SociologicaHome page
S. Ferlander
The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for Health
Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2007; 50(2): 115 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]