Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Acta Sociologica
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helén, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yesilova, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Shepherding Desire

Sexual Health Promotion in Finland from the 1940s to the 1990s

Ilpo Helén

University of Helsinki, Finland

Katja Yesilova

University of Helsinki, Finland

In this article, sexual policy in Finland is analysed through two historical cases: first, contraception guidance and medical-psychological marital counselling at the Family Federation of Finland’s (Väestöliitto) dispensaries from the late 1940s to the early 1960s, and, second, comprehensive sex education for adolescents from the 1970s to the 1990s. The study focuses on two modes of sexual government, namely the pastoral mode, which subjects individuals to expertise on sexuality, and self-government based on self-inspection. It is emphasized that in Finland sexuality has been problematized and governed in the context of medicine and health care. The most noticeable dissimilarity between the two settings is that in the former the locus of problematization of the sexual self is sexual adjustment in the nuclear family and marriage, while in the latter sexuality is defined in an individualistic manner, and the core question concerns personal sexual liberation. However, in both settings an understanding of sexuality as one’s own initially developed in the context of problems of reproductive health and contraception. In addition, women and female sexuality remained the focus of sexual government throughout the period under study.

Key Words: contraception • family policy • Finland • health education • marriage counselling • sexual politics

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 49, No. 3, 257-272 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0001699306067708


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
S. Paasonen
Healthy Sex and Pop Porn: Pornography, Feminism and the Finnish Context
Sexualities, October 1, 2009; 12(5): 586 - 604.
[Abstract] [PDF]