This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jackson, M. Articles by Yaish, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment

The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales

Nuffield College, Oxford, UK, michelle.jackson{at}nuffield.ox.ac.uk

Robert Erikson

Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, Robert.Erikson{at}sofi.su.se

John H. Goldthorpe

Nuffield College, Oxford, UK, john.goldthorpe{at}nuffield.ox.ac.uk

Meir Yaish

University of Haifa, Israel, myaish{at}univ.haifa.ac.il

In this article we start from Boudon's important, but still surprisingly neglected, distinction between `primary' and `secondary' effects in the creation of class differentials in educational attainment. Primary effects are all those, whether of a genetic or socio-cultural kind, that are expressed via the association between children's class backgrounds and their actual levels of academic performance. Secondary effects are those that are expressed via the educational choices that children from differing class backgrounds make within the range of choice that their previous performance allows them. We apply a method introduced by Erikson and Jonsson to represent the relationship between primary and secondary effects in analysing class differentials in one crucial transition within the English and Welsh educational system: that which children make at around age 16 and which determines whether or not they will pursue the higher-level academic qualifications — A-levels — that are usually required for university entry. We then use a development of this method that we have earlier proposed in order to produce quantitative estimates of the relative importance of primary and secondary effects as they operate within this transition. We show that secondary effects reinforce primary effects to a substantial extent, accounting for at least one quarter, and possibly up to one-half, of class differentials as measured by odds ratios. In conclusion, we consider some theoretical and policy implications of our findings.

Key Words: class origin • educational inequality • England and Wales • primary effects • secondary effects

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 50, No. 3, 211-229 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0001699307080926


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Tieben Parental Resources and Relative Risk Aversion in Intra-secondary Transitions: A Trend Analysis of Non-standard Educational Decision Situations in the Netherlands Eur. Sociol. Rev., November 23, 2009; (2009) jcp053v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Gabay-Egozi, Y. Shavit, and M. Yaish Curricular Choice: A Test of a Rational Choice Model of Education Eur. Sociol. Rev., June 5, 2009; (2009) jcp031v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Erikson and F. Rudolphi Change in Social Selection to Upper Secondary School--Primary and Secondary Effects in Sweden Eur. Sociol. Rev., May 15, 2009; (2009) jcp022v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Becker and A. E. Hecken Higher Education or Vocational Training?: An Empirical Test of the Rational Action Model of Educational Choices Suggested by Breen and Goldthorpe and Esser Acta Sociologica, March 1, 2009; 52(1): 25 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Goldthorpe and C. Mills Trends in Intergenerational Class Mobility in Modern Britain: Evidence From National Surveys, 1972--2005 National Institute Economic Review, July 1, 2008; 205(1): 83 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]