Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Acta Sociologica
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ødegård, G.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Opposition and Integration in Norwegian Youth Networks

The Significance of Social and Political Resources, 1992—2002

Guro Ødegård

Norwegian Social Research, NOVA, Norway, god{at}nova.no

Frode Berglund

Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR), Norway, frodeb{at}nibr.no

In this article, we address how the social networks of Norwegian teenagers influence their formation of social and political resources. We distinguish between youth networks that are adult-managed and networks managed by the youth involved. The analysis is based on two representative surveys, Young in Norway 1992 and 2002. Based on a theoretical framework related to Putnam's theory of social capital, we discuss how young people's declining trust in the authority of adult society and their increased willingness to vote in general elections during the past decade might be understood. The findings imply that the adult-managed networks (generation-bridging) generate trust among the young participators. However, they are no more willing to vote than youth existing outside such networks. On the contrary, youth-managed networks (youth-bonding) in which adults do not have any natural positions or access seem to mobilize young people into participating through elections, even though they show a lower level of trust than their peers outside such networks. The findings imply that the generation gap produces mistrust and an oppositional attitude to the adult world, which has a positive influence on young people's political participation and integration.

Key Words: generation gap • networks • political participation • social and political resources • voluntary organizations • young people

Acta Sociologica, Vol. 51, No. 4, 275-291 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0001699308097374


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?