Acta Sociologica

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedström, P.
Right arrow Articles by Swedberg, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Acta Sociologica, Vol. 39, No. 3, 281-308 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/000169939603900302

Social Mechanisms

Peter Hedström

Stockholm University

Richard Swedberg

Stockholm University

In this article it is argued that the search for 'social mechanisms' is of crucial importance for the development of sociological theory. With this concept - which is occasionally used in the sociological literature but has received little systematic attention - attention is called to an intermediary level of analysis in-between pure description and story- telling, on the one hand, and universal social laws, on the other. While the search for universal laws and grand theory has a great deal of appeal, we do not believe that this type of theorizing is likely to foster the development of a useful body of explanatory theory. Drawing on the heritage of Robert Merton and James Coleman, it is argued that the essential aim of sociological theorizing should be to develop fine-grained middle-range theories that clearly explicate the social mechanisms that produce observed relationships between explanans and explanandum. We provide a tentative typology of social mechanisms, and we illustrate our argument by showing that three well-known theories in sociology- the self-fulfilling prophecy (Robert Merton), network diffusion (James Coleman), and threshold-based behavior (Mark Granovetter) - all are founded upon the same social mechanism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Classical SociologyHome page
S. Segre
Durkheim on Rationality
Journal of Classical Sociology, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 109 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
N. J. Foss
The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics
Organization, January 1, 2007; 14(1): 29 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
O. Backman and C. Edling
Review Essay : Mathematics Matters: On the Absence of Mathematical Models in Quantitative Sociology
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1999; 42(1): 69 - 78.
[PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
R. Swedberg
New Economic Sociology: What Has Been Accomplished, What Is Ahead?
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1997; 40(2): 161 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]