This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Aaltojärvi, I. Articles by Pasanen, H.-M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Scientific Productivity, Web Visibility and Citation Patterns in Sixteen Nordic Sociology Departments

Department of Sociology and Social Psychology and Institute for Social Research, University of Tampere, Finland, inari.aaltojarvi{at}uta.fi

Ilkka Arminen

Department of Sociology and Social Psychology and Institute for Social Research, University of Tampere, Finland, ilkka.arminen{at}uta.fi

Otto Auranen

Department of Sociology and Social Psychology and Institute for Social Research, University of Tampere, Finland, otto.auranen{at}uta.fi

Hanna-Mari Pasanen

Department of Sociology and Social Psychology and Institute for Social Research, University of Tampere, Finland, hanna-mari.pasanen{at}uta.fi

Science is being published increasingly on the web. In this article, we explore how Nordic sociology is represented on Google Scholar (GS), what its output and impact is, and what factors explain it. Our data consist of faculty in 16 Nordic sociology departments in March 2005. The distribution of their publications and citations is skewed. Thirteen per cent of scholars do not appear on GS, whereas only 15 per cent have more than 5 publications. Of scholars with at least 1 publication (n = 240), 75 per cent have at most 10 citations. Both the number of web hits (web visibility) and citations are influenced by the gender of the faculty member, type and age of publication. Web visibility, citations and position are mutually reinforcing. Departmental effect is greater in web visibility than citations. International publications have started to dominate the social sciences, international monographs being particularly frequently cited. The remaining salience of books shows that sociology is still a distinct form of knowledge. The exclusive use of refereed articles and direct comparisons with the natural sciences ignore important aspects of the social sciences. In all, while GS produces findings similar to those in citation databases such as the SSCI, some systematic differences exist. No individual method for measuring scientific output is objective.

Key Words: citation • Google Scholar • Nordic sociology • scientific output • scientific productivity • Thomson scientific • web visibility

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?